April 13, 2008

Boycott-induced introversion – not environmentally friendly

Posted in boycott, british greens, israel tagged , , at 11:32 pm by Mira Vogel

As well as not working very well (especially when they’re vague and don’t have realistic aims, as in the case of our embarrassing and hate-inspiring Motion C05), boycotting a country causes that country to turn in on itself. It’s worth noting, since there’s a tendency to mis-compare Israel with South Africa, that the end of apartheid was achieved through popular uprising and the political acumen of anti-apartheid activists like Nelson Mandela, and the role of the boycott, which had the side-effect of making apartheid-supporting South Africans – the holders of power – defiantly hunker down, is contested.

Israelis understand that the intention of their boycotters is to cancel Israel – by referring to it as an ‘apartheid state’ as if Israel and Palestine were a single country, by proposing to starve it of weapons despite the avowed obliterationist intentions of powerful regional factions like Hesbollah and Hamas, or by claiming that all Palestinians have the right to live in Israel. Understandable if they feel a tiny bit alienated and insecure.

After all, Israel has been boycotted and under attack since its inception, a circumstance which, in the consciousness of many Jews, is merely a continuation of age-old attacks on, boycotts of, discrimination against, and explusion of Jews. British Greens should care more.

This Jerusalem Post article on an Israeli bill to introduce a 1NIS charge for each plastic bag used in supermarkets, makes a few points that Green Boycotters should note. One is to do with the fact that states who feel under attack relegate environmentalism down their list of priorities. Another is the impact of Israelis who have travelled and return with stories about how other countries are handling their environmental problems. I doubt if many Israelis are looking to Boycotting Britannia right now. Greens Stop the Boycott would like to change that.

Yehuda Olander, manager of the Sharon District Regional Division for the Quality of the Environment, attributes Israel’s lack of progress on environment preservation to its constant occupation with survival. “Survival here is not only talking about the environment, it’s talking about security,” he explains. “Ten to 20 years ago, when the rest of the world began caring for the environment, Israel was focused on surviving as a country.

“But it works to Israel’s advantage,” Olander continues. Through other countries’ successes and failures, Israel can learn how to be more environmentally responsible.

“[Israelis] come back from Europe and [other parts of the world] and say ‘Wow, look what they have done – how they recycle and how they avoid traveling too much in their cars.'”

Advertisements

5 Comments »

  1. Alec Macpherson said,

    What I find particularly odious about the Israel/Apartheid comparison by certain Arab leaders or their supporters is that it wasn’t Israeli oil fueling SA vehicles during that period.

    Plus, can someone tell me why, if there is “a form a Apartheid”, do suicide bombers get into buses or cafés? Surely the gold-standard form aimed to prevent this.

  2. miravogel said,

    Yes. Many of the things that anti-Israel people call apartheid are responses to the Intifada. Justifiable response or not, few of us seem qualified to say. Put it this way, there are no experts in these kinds of international relations involved in any of the debates I’m unfortunate enough to be having about whether or not Israel is an apartheid state, with reference to wall, route of wall, and checkpoints.

    The far-flung settlements of the occupied territories, the illegal settlement outposts and the network of roads required to reach them are another thing though. They are appalling. But (and I wish I could just stop there but I’d like to avoid giving any bones for boycotters) if you zoom out and survey all the violent repression and death in the world, the intense and loud condemnation of some activists and small political groupings with Israel looks very strange indeed.

  3. Alec Macpherson said,

    D’you mean strange as in inexplicable or “I know what you are, I recognize you”?

  4. miravogel said,

    Strange as in weird. Weird as in brrr.

  5. Alec Macpherson said,

    Aye. Many, I suspect, have firewalled their monomanias from the rational parts of their minds, and don’t think they’re being unreasonable or acting as facilitators for cognizant antisemites like the revolting John Wight or Mick Napier. There’s no denying the Palestinians have suffered miserably, but there my sympathy with them [the muppet-baby boycotters] ends.

    The more someone apologizes for a event which they cannot be connected reasonably to (e.g. Balfour, the Iraq War), the less likely I think it is that they actually feel sorry for it. Heck, I don’t feel sorry for a lot of things I *have* done. There is no humility, no self-effacement, just constant appeals to [their own] authority.

    I wonder how much Israeli intellectual property is used in the water-reclamation process.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: